Gomez-Garcia F, Ruano J, Aguilar-Luque M, Gay-Mimbrera J, Maestre-Lopez B, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Gonzalez-Padilla Yards, Velez Garcia-Nieto An excellent, Isla-Tejera B
3 months) between your history look time and full guide go out. With this specific guidance, journals must look into asking for people out of SRs so you’re able to revision its literary works research up until the acceptance of one’s SRs. SR users might also want to ascertain committed slowdown between your past look big date of your reviews making sure that the evidence try up-to-go out having active health-related choice-to make.
Records
Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz Grams: Clinical evaluations during the healthcare an useful book. Inside the. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press,; 2001: step one online money (148 p.).
Chalmers We. Section 24: having fun with logical evaluations and you will reports off constant trials having medical and moral demo construction, overseeing, and you may reporting. In: Egger Yards, Smith GD, Altman DG, writers. Systematic product reviews inside health care : meta-analysis from inside the perspective. second ed. London: BMJ; 2001. p. 42943.
Sutton AJ, Cooper Nj-new jersey, Jones DR. Proof synthesis due to the fact the answer to alot more defined and you can productive lookup. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:30.
Beller EM, Chen JK, Wang UL, Glasziou PP. Try clinical reviews up-to-go out in the course of publication? Syst Rev. 2013;2:36.
Palese A good, Coletti S, Dante A good. Guide results among high impression factor nursing journals in 2009: good retrospective research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(4):54351.
Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y, Kimachi M, Shimizu S, Ikenoue T, Fukuma S, Yamamoto Y, Fukuhara S. Almost all clinical reviews had written within the higher-impression journals failed to sign in the fresh protocols: an effective meta-epidemiological analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;60.
Polkki T, Kanste O, Kaariainen M, Elo S, Kyngas H. The fresh methodological quality of systematic studies blogged from inside the higher-impression medical magazines: a peek at new literature. J Clin Nurs https://kissbridesdate.com/tr/omegle-inceleme/. 2014;23(34):31532.
Bath-Hextall F, Wharrad H, Leonardi-Bee J. Training gadgets inside the evidence depending routine: analysis out of recyclable studying items (RLOs) for discovering meta-studies. BMC Med Educ. 2011;.
Shea Blowjob, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, KristSTAR try an established and you will appropriate dimensions equipment to evaluate the new methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):101320.
Riado Minguez D, Kowalski Yards, Vallve Odena Yards, Longin Pontzen D, Jelicic Kadic A good, Jeric Yards, Dosenovic S, Jakus D, Vrdoljak Yards, Poklepovic Pericic T, mais aussi al. Methodological and you may revealing quality of systematic recommendations penned on the large ranking guides in the area of discomfort. Anesth Analg. 2017;
Samargandi OA, Hasan H. The caliber of systematic studies available businesses: an analysis playing with AMSTAR. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3):482e3e.
Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Jagannath Virtual assistant, Sharif MO. A keen AMSTAR testing of your methodological quality of systematic recommendations off oral medical care interventions typed about diary out of used oral technology (JAOS). J Appl Dental Sci. 2011;19(5):4407.
Logical ratings and meta-analyses for the psoriasis: part out-of resource present, disagreement of interest and you can bibliometric indices since the predictors off methodological top quality. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(6):1633forty two.
Brandt JS, Downing Air-conditioning, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST. Citation classics from inside the obstetrics and gynecology: brand new 100 most often cited record content in the last 50 age. Are J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):355.e1eight.
Huang Y, Mao C, Yuan J, Yang Z, Di M, Tam WW, Tang J. Shipping and you will epidemiological services away from penned individual patient research meta-analyses. PLoS You to definitely. 2014;9(6):e100151.
Tam WWS, Lo KKH. Khalechelvam P: Affirmation off PRISMA report and you will top-notch health-related evaluations and you will meta-analyses had written when you look at the breastfeeding journals: a combination-sectional analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e013905.
Shea Bj, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers M, Andersson Letter, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai Good, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM. Exterior validation regarding a measurement product to assess health-related product reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS That. 2007;2(12):e1350.