Gomez-Garcia F, Ruano J, Aguilar-Luque M, Gay-Mimbrera J, Maestre-Lopez B, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Gonzalez-Padilla Yards, Velez Garcia-Nieto An excellent, Isla-Tejera B
3 months) between your history look time and full guide go out. With this specific guidance, journals must look into asking for people out of SRs so you’re able to revision its literary works research up until the acceptance of one’s SRs. SR users might also want to ascertain committed slowdown between your past look big date of your reviews making sure that the evidence try up-to-go out having active health-related choice-to make.
Records
Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz Grams: Clinical evaluations during the healthcare an useful book. Inside the. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press,; 2001: step one online money (148 p.).
Chalmers We. Section 24: having fun with logical evaluations and you will reports off constant trials having medical and moral demo construction, overseeing, and you may reporting. In: Egger Yards, Smith GD, Altman DG, writers. Systematic product reviews inside health care : meta-analysis from inside the perspective. second ed. London: BMJ; 2001. p. 42943.
Sutton AJ, Cooper Nj-new jersey, Jones DR. Proof synthesis due to the fact the answer to alot more defined and you can productive lookup. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:30.
Beller EM, Chen JK, Wang UL, Glasziou PP. Try clinical reviews up-to-go out in the course of publication? Syst Rev. 2013;2:36.
Palese A good, Coletti S, Dante A good. Guide results among high impression factor nursing journals in 2009: good retrospective research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(4):54351. Continue reading